Beech Mountain vs Sugar Mountain
Beech Mountain (North Carolina) and Sugar Mountain (North Carolina) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Beech Mountain | Sugar Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 751 ft (229 m) | 1,171 ft (357 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,446 ft | 5,233 ft |
| Base elevation | 4,695 ft | 4,062 ft |
| Lifts | 8 | 8 |
| Runs | 12 | 26 |
| Beginner terrain | 25% | 42% |
| Intermediate terrain | 42% | 46% |
| Expert terrain | 33% | 12% |
| Night skiing | Yes | Yes |
Sugar Mountain has the bigger vertical (1,171 ft vs 751 ft); Sugar Mountain has more runs (26 vs 12); Beech Mountain skews more expert (33% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Beech Mountain | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sugar Mountain | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Beech Mountain
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Beech Mountain
Related comparisons
Cataloochee Ski Area vs Sugar MountainHatley Pointe vs Sugar MountainSugar Mountain vs Wolf Ridge Ski ResortAppalachian Ski Mountain vs Sugar MountainBeech Mountain vs Cataloochee Ski AreaBeech Mountain vs Hatley PointeBeech Mountain vs Wolf Ridge Ski ResortAppalachian Ski Mountain vs Beech Mountain
More detail: Beech Mountain stats · Sugar Mountain stats