Big Squaw Mountain Resort vs Sugarloaf
Big Squaw Mountain Resort (Maine) and Sugarloaf (Maine) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Big Squaw Mountain Resort | Sugarloaf |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 577 ft (176 m) | 2,766 ft (843 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,903 ft | 4,163 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,325 ft | 1,394 ft |
| Lifts | 2 | 14 |
| Runs | 26 | 137 |
| Beginner terrain | 5% | 36% |
| Intermediate terrain | 73% | 35% |
| Expert terrain | 22% | 29% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Sugarloaf has the bigger vertical (2,766 ft vs 577 ft); Sugarloaf has more runs (137 vs 26); Sugarloaf skews more expert (29% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Big Squaw Mountain Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sugarloaf | Ikon Pass: 7 daysMountain Collective: 2 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Big Squaw Mountain Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Big Squaw Mountain Resort
Related comparisons
Sugarloaf vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafLoon Mountain Ski Resort vs SugarloafSki Bromont vs SugarloafSaddleback Maine vs SugarloafSaddleback Mountain vs SugarloafPleasant Mountain Ski Area vs SugarloafMt Abram vs Sugarloaf
More detail: Big Squaw Mountain Resort stats · Sugarloaf stats