Blue Mountain vs Mount Pakenham
Blue Mountain (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Blue Mountain | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 722 ft (220 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,480 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 758 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 13 | 6 |
| Runs | 60 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 26% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 46% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 28% | 20% |
| Night skiing | Yes | - |
Blue Mountain has the bigger vertical (722 ft vs 262 ft); Blue Mountain has more runs (60 vs 15); Blue Mountain skews more expert (28% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Blue Mountain | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Blue Mountain
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Blue Mountain
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneBlue Mountain vs Craigleith Ski ClubBlue Mountain vs Snow ValleyBlue Mountain vs Georgian Peaks ClubBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Blue MountainBlue Mountain vs Horseshoe ResortBlue Mountain vs Caledon Ski ClubBlue Mountain vs Calabogie Peaks
More detail: Blue Mountain stats · Mount Pakenham stats