China Peak vs Granlibakken
China Peak (California) and Granlibakken (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | China Peak | Granlibakken |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,598 ft (487 m) | 207 ft (63 m) |
| Summit elevation | 8,629 ft | 6,555 ft |
| Base elevation | 7,031 ft | 6,348 ft |
| Lifts | 11 | 1 |
| Runs | 105 | 1 |
| Beginner terrain | 16% | 0% |
| Intermediate terrain | 60% | 100% |
| Expert terrain | 24% | 0% |
| Night skiing | No | - |
China Peak has the bigger vertical (1,598 ft vs 207 ft); China Peak has more runs (105 vs 1); China Peak skews more expert (24% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| China Peak | Indy Pass: 2 days |
| Granlibakken | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near China Peak
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near China Peak
Related comparisons
China Peak vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaChina Peak vs Palisades TahoeChina Peak vs Northstar CaliforniaAlpine Meadows vs China PeakGranlibakken vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaChina Peak vs Sierra-at-TahoeBear Valley Mountain Resort vs China PeakChina Peak vs Sugar Bowl Ski Resort
More detail: China Peak stats · Granlibakken stats