Craigieburn Valley Ski Area vs Mount Hutt Ski Area
Craigieburn Valley Ski Area (Canterbury Region) and Mount Hutt Ski Area (Canterbury Region) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Craigieburn Valley Ski Area | Mount Hutt Ski Area |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,693 ft (516 m) | 2,119 ft (646 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,938 ft | 6,775 ft |
| Base elevation | 4,245 ft | 4,656 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 5 |
| Runs | 24 | 35 |
| Beginner terrain | 4% | 19% |
| Intermediate terrain | 46% | 50% |
| Expert terrain | 50% | 31% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mount Hutt Ski Area has the bigger vertical (2,119 ft vs 1,693 ft); Mount Hutt Ski Area has more runs (35 vs 24); Craigieburn Valley Ski Area skews more expert (50% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Craigieburn Valley Ski Area | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Hutt Ski Area | Ikon Pass: 7 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Craigieburn Valley Ski Area
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Craigieburn Valley Ski Area
Related comparisons
Mount Hutt Ski Area vs Porters Ski AreaMount Hutt Ski Area vs Roundhill Ski AreaBroken River Ski Area vs Mount Hutt Ski AreaCraigieburn Valley Ski Area vs Porters Ski AreaCraigieburn Valley Ski Area vs Roundhill Ski AreaBroken River Ski Area vs Craigieburn Valley Ski AreaMount Hutt Ski Area vs Temple BasinMount Hutt Ski Area vs Ohau
More detail: Craigieburn Valley Ski Area stats · Mount Hutt Ski Area stats