Emmetten-Stockhütte vs Gerschnialp
Emmetten-Stockhütte (Nidwalden) and Gerschnialp (Nidwalden) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Emmetten-Stockhütte | Gerschnialp |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 2,411 ft (735 m) | 6,699 ft (2,042 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,345 ft | 9,974 ft |
| Base elevation | 3,934 ft | 3,271 ft |
| Lifts | 20 | 30 |
| Runs | 72 | 97 |
| Beginner terrain | 80% | 42% |
| Intermediate terrain | 20% | 50% |
| Expert terrain | 0% | 8% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Gerschnialp has the bigger vertical (6,699 ft vs 2,411 ft); Gerschnialp has more runs (97 vs 72); Gerschnialp skews more expert (8% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Emmetten-Stockhütte | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Gerschnialp | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Emmetten-Stockhütte
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Emmetten-Stockhütte
Related comparisons
More detail: Emmetten-Stockhütte stats · Gerschnialp stats