Fageralm vs Zwieselalm
Fageralm (Salzburg) and Zwieselalm (Salzburg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Fageralm | Zwieselalm |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 3,015 ft (919 m) | 2,858 ft (871 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,083 ft | 5,302 ft |
| Base elevation | 3,068 ft | 2,444 ft |
| Lifts | 6 | 25 |
| Runs | 28 | 69 |
| Beginner terrain | 63% | 27% |
| Intermediate terrain | 37% | 68% |
| Expert terrain | 0% | 5% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Fageralm has the bigger vertical (3,015 ft vs 2,858 ft); Zwieselalm has more runs (69 vs 28); Zwieselalm skews more expert (5% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Fageralm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Zwieselalm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Fageralm
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Fageralm
Related comparisons
Ski amadé vs ZwieselalmFageralm vs Ski amadéZillertal Arena vs ZwieselalmFageralm vs Zillertal ArenaSnow Space Salzburg vs ZwieselalmKaprun Kitzsteinhorn Maiskogel vs ZwieselalmFageralm vs Snow Space SalzburgObertauern vs Zwieselalm
More detail: Fageralm stats · Zwieselalm stats