Granlibakken vs Mountain High
Granlibakken (California) and Mountain High (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Granlibakken | Mountain High |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 207 ft (63 m) | 1,594 ft (486 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,555 ft | 8,182 ft |
| Base elevation | 6,348 ft | 6,588 ft |
| Lifts | 1 | 15 |
| Runs | 1 | 43 |
| Beginner terrain | 0% | 23% |
| Intermediate terrain | 100% | 33% |
| Expert terrain | 0% | 44% |
| Night skiing | - | Yes |
Mountain High has the bigger vertical (1,594 ft vs 207 ft); Mountain High has more runs (43 vs 1); Mountain High skews more expert (44% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Granlibakken | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mountain High | Indy Pass: 2 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Granlibakken
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Granlibakken
Related comparisons
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Mountain HighMountain High vs Palisades TahoeMountain High vs Northstar CaliforniaGranlibakken vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaAlpine Meadows vs Mountain HighChina Peak vs Mountain HighMountain High vs Sierra-at-TahoeBear Valley Mountain Resort vs Mountain High
More detail: Granlibakken stats · Mountain High stats