Granlibakken vs Sierra-at-Tahoe
Granlibakken (California) and Sierra-at-Tahoe (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Granlibakken | Sierra-at-Tahoe |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 207 ft (63 m) | 2,175 ft (663 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,555 ft | 8,835 ft |
| Base elevation | 6,348 ft | 6,660 ft |
| Lifts | 1 | 13 |
| Runs | 1 | 41 |
| Beginner terrain | 0% | 41% |
| Intermediate terrain | 100% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 0% | 18% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Sierra-at-Tahoe has the bigger vertical (2,175 ft vs 207 ft); Sierra-at-Tahoe has more runs (41 vs 1); Sierra-at-Tahoe skews more expert (18% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Granlibakken | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sierra-at-Tahoe | Ikon Pass: 7 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Granlibakken
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Granlibakken
Related comparisons
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Sierra-at-TahoePalisades Tahoe vs Sierra-at-TahoeNorthstar California vs Sierra-at-TahoeAlpine Meadows vs Sierra-at-TahoeGranlibakken vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaChina Peak vs Sierra-at-TahoeBear Valley Mountain Resort vs Sierra-at-TahoeSierra-at-Tahoe vs Sugar Bowl Ski Resort
More detail: Granlibakken stats · Sierra-at-Tahoe stats