Hakodate Nanae Snowpark vs Mount Racey
Hakodate Nanae Snowpark (Hokkaido Prefecture) and Mount Racey (Hokkaido Prefecture) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Hakodate Nanae Snowpark | Mount Racey |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 2,270 ft (692 m) | 1,319 ft (402 m) |
| Summit elevation | 3,114 ft | 2,293 ft |
| Base elevation | 843 ft | 978 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 3 |
| Runs | 13 | 21 |
| Beginner terrain | 62% | 39% |
| Intermediate terrain | 31% | 39% |
| Expert terrain | 7% | 22% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Hakodate Nanae Snowpark has the bigger vertical (2,270 ft vs 1,319 ft); Mount Racey has more runs (21 vs 13); Mount Racey skews more expert (22% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Hakodate Nanae Snowpark | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Racey | Indy Pass: 2 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Hakodate Nanae Snowpark
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Hakodate Nanae Snowpark
Related comparisons
Hakodate Nanae Snowpark vs Niseko Hanazono ResortHakodate Nanae Snowpark vs Niseko UnitedMount Racey vs Niseko Hanazono ResortMount Racey vs Niseko UnitedFurano Ski Resort vs Hakodate Nanae SnowparkHakodate Nanae Snowpark vs Rusutsu ResortFurano Ski Resort vs Mount RaceyHakodate Nanae Snowpark vs Kiroro Snow World
More detail: Hakodate Nanae Snowpark stats · Mount Racey stats