Lachtal vs Riesneralm
Lachtal (Styria) and Riesneralm (Styria) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Lachtal | Riesneralm |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 2,057 ft (627 m) | 2,795 ft (852 m) |
| Summit elevation | 7,215 ft | 5,968 ft |
| Base elevation | 5,157 ft | 3,169 ft |
| Lifts | 10 | 7 |
| Runs | 52 | 41 |
| Beginner terrain | 31% | 64% |
| Intermediate terrain | 60% | 28% |
| Expert terrain | 9% | 8% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Riesneralm has the bigger vertical (2,795 ft vs 2,057 ft); Lachtal has more runs (52 vs 41); Lachtal skews more expert (9% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Lachtal | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Riesneralm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Lachtal
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Lachtal
Related comparisons
Riesneralm vs TauplitzalmLachtal vs TauplitzalmKreischberg vs RiesneralmKreischberg vs LachtalAflenzer Bürgeralm vs RiesneralmAflenzer Bürgeralm vs LachtalGalsterberg vs RiesneralmGalsterberg vs Lachtal
More detail: Lachtal stats · Riesneralm stats