Loch Lomond vs Lutsen Mountains
Loch Lomond (Ontario) and Lutsen Mountains (Minnesota) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Loch Lomond | Lutsen Mountains |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 587 ft (179 m) | 774 ft (236 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,414 ft | 1,680 ft |
| Base elevation | 823 ft | 906 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 8 |
| Runs | 22 | 76 |
| Beginner terrain | 27% | 5% |
| Intermediate terrain | 32% | 68% |
| Expert terrain | 41% | 27% |
| Night skiing | - | Yes |
Lutsen Mountains has the bigger vertical (774 ft vs 587 ft); Lutsen Mountains has more runs (76 vs 22); Loch Lomond skews more expert (41% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Loch Lomond | Indy Pass: 2 days |
| Lutsen Mountains | Ikon Pass: 7 daysIndy Pass: 2 days |
One pass covers both: Indy Pass. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Loch Lomond
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Loch Lomond
Related comparisons
Afton Alps vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Snowriver MountainLutsen Mountains vs Welch VillageGiants Ridge vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Whitecap MountainLutsen Mountains vs Spirit MountainBuck Hill vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Mount Kato
More detail: Loch Lomond stats · Lutsen Mountains stats