Loferer Alm vs Zwieselalm
Loferer Alm (Salzburg) and Zwieselalm (Salzburg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Loferer Alm | Zwieselalm |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 3,432 ft (1,046 m) | 2,858 ft (871 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,492 ft | 5,302 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,060 ft | 2,444 ft |
| Lifts | 11 | 25 |
| Runs | 34 | 69 |
| Beginner terrain | 56% | 27% |
| Intermediate terrain | 35% | 68% |
| Expert terrain | 9% | 5% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Loferer Alm has the bigger vertical (3,432 ft vs 2,858 ft); Zwieselalm has more runs (69 vs 34); Loferer Alm skews more expert (9% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Loferer Alm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Zwieselalm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Loferer Alm
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Loferer Alm
Related comparisons
Ski amadé vs ZwieselalmLoferer Alm vs Ski amadéZillertal Arena vs ZwieselalmLoferer Alm vs Zillertal ArenaSnow Space Salzburg vs ZwieselalmKaprun Kitzsteinhorn Maiskogel vs ZwieselalmLoferer Alm vs Snow Space SalzburgKaprun Kitzsteinhorn Maiskogel vs Loferer Alm
More detail: Loferer Alm stats · Zwieselalm stats