Lonesome Pine Trails vs Sugarloaf
Lonesome Pine Trails (Maine) and Sugarloaf (Maine) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Lonesome Pine Trails | Sugarloaf |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 417 ft (127 m) | 2,766 ft (843 m) |
| Summit elevation | 978 ft | 4,163 ft |
| Base elevation | 561 ft | 1,394 ft |
| Lifts | 2 | 14 |
| Runs | 18 | 137 |
| Beginner terrain | 6% | 36% |
| Intermediate terrain | 72% | 35% |
| Expert terrain | 22% | 29% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Sugarloaf has the bigger vertical (2,766 ft vs 417 ft); Sugarloaf has more runs (137 vs 18); Sugarloaf skews more expert (29% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Lonesome Pine Trails | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sugarloaf | Ikon Pass: 7 daysMountain Collective: 2 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Lonesome Pine Trails
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Lonesome Pine Trails
Related comparisons
Sugarloaf vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafLoon Mountain Ski Resort vs SugarloafSki Bromont vs SugarloafSaddleback Maine vs SugarloafSaddleback Mountain vs SugarloafPleasant Mountain Ski Area vs SugarloafMt Abram vs Sugarloaf
More detail: Lonesome Pine Trails stats · Sugarloaf stats