Lutsen Mountains vs Mont Ripley
Lutsen Mountains (Minnesota) and Mont Ripley (Michigan) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Lutsen Mountains | Mont Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 774 ft (236 m) | 430 ft (131 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,680 ft | 1,079 ft |
| Base elevation | 906 ft | 650 ft |
| Lifts | 8 | 4 |
| Runs | 76 | 25 |
| Beginner terrain | 5% | 36% |
| Intermediate terrain | 68% | 40% |
| Expert terrain | 27% | 24% |
| Night skiing | Yes | - |
Lutsen Mountains has the bigger vertical (774 ft vs 430 ft); Lutsen Mountains has more runs (76 vs 25); Lutsen Mountains skews more expert (27% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Lutsen Mountains | Ikon Pass: 7 daysIndy Pass: 2 days |
| Mont Ripley | Indy Pass: 2 days |
One pass covers both: Indy Pass. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Lutsen Mountains
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Lutsen Mountains
Related comparisons
Afton Alps vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Snowriver MountainLutsen Mountains vs Welch VillageGiants Ridge vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Whitecap MountainLutsen Mountains vs Spirit MountainBuck Hill vs Lutsen MountainsLutsen Mountains vs Mount Kato
More detail: Lutsen Mountains stats · Mont Ripley stats