McCauley Mountain vs Thunder Ridge Ski Area
McCauley Mountain (New York) and Thunder Ridge Ski Area (New York) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | McCauley Mountain | Thunder Ridge Ski Area |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 515 ft (157 m) | 394 ft (120 m) |
| Summit elevation | 2,320 ft | 876 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,804 ft | 482 ft |
| Lifts | 5 | 6 |
| Runs | 21 | 17 |
| Beginner terrain | 29% | 44% |
| Intermediate terrain | 52% | 19% |
| Expert terrain | 19% | 37% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
McCauley Mountain has the bigger vertical (515 ft vs 394 ft); McCauley Mountain has more runs (21 vs 17); Thunder Ridge Ski Area skews more expert (37% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| McCauley Mountain | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Thunder Ridge Ski Area | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near McCauley Mountain
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near McCauley Mountain
Related comparisons
McCauley Mountain vs Whiteface Mountain Ski AreaGore Mountain vs McCauley MountainThunder Ridge Ski Area vs Whiteface Mountain Ski AreaGore Mountain vs Thunder Ridge Ski AreaHunter Mountain vs McCauley MountainHunter Mountain vs Thunder Ridge Ski AreaHoliday Valley vs McCauley MountainMcCauley Mountain vs Windham Mountain
More detail: McCauley Mountain stats · Thunder Ridge Ski Area stats