Mont-Castor vs Mont-Grand-Fonds
Mont-Castor (Quebec) and Mont-Grand-Fonds (Quebec) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mont-Castor | Mont-Grand-Fonds |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 551 ft (168 m) | 1,086 ft (331 m) |
| Summit elevation | 620 ft | 2,382 ft |
| Base elevation | 66 ft | 1,296 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 3 |
| Runs | 26 | 13 |
| Beginner terrain | 23% | 31% |
| Intermediate terrain | 42% | 38% |
| Expert terrain | 35% | 31% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mont-Grand-Fonds has the bigger vertical (1,086 ft vs 551 ft); Mont-Castor has more runs (26 vs 13); Mont-Castor skews more expert (35% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mont-Castor | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mont-Grand-Fonds | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mont-Castor
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mont-Castor
Related comparisons
Mont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Tremblant ResortMont-Castor vs Mont Tremblant ResortLe Massif vs Mont-Grand-FondsLe Massif vs Mont-CastorMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont-Sainte-AnneMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont SuttonMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mount SuttonMont-Grand-Fonds vs Ski Bromont
More detail: Mont-Castor stats · Mont-Grand-Fonds stats