Mont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Orford
Mont-Grand-Fonds (Quebec) and Mont Orford (Quebec) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mont-Grand-Fonds | Mont Orford |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,086 ft (331 m) | 1,709 ft (521 m) |
| Summit elevation | 2,382 ft | 2,746 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,296 ft | 1,037 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 8 |
| Runs | 13 | 37 |
| Beginner terrain | 31% | 54% |
| Intermediate terrain | 38% | 35% |
| Expert terrain | 31% | 11% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Mont Orford has the bigger vertical (1,709 ft vs 1,086 ft); Mont Orford has more runs (37 vs 13); Mont-Grand-Fonds skews more expert (31% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mont-Grand-Fonds | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mont Orford | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Related comparisons
Mont Orford vs Mont Tremblant ResortLe Massif vs Mont OrfordMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Tremblant ResortMont Orford vs Mont-Sainte-AnneMont Orford vs Mont SuttonMont Orford vs Mount SuttonMont Orford vs Ski BromontLe Massif vs Mont-Grand-Fonds
More detail: Mont-Grand-Fonds stats · Mont Orford stats