Mont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Orignal
Mont-Grand-Fonds (Quebec) and Mont Orignal (Quebec) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mont-Grand-Fonds | Mont Orignal |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,086 ft (331 m) | 797 ft (243 m) |
| Summit elevation | 2,382 ft | 1,982 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,296 ft | 1,184 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 4 |
| Runs | 13 | 17 |
| Beginner terrain | 31% | 25% |
| Intermediate terrain | 38% | 25% |
| Expert terrain | 31% | 50% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mont-Grand-Fonds has the bigger vertical (1,086 ft vs 797 ft); Mont Orignal has more runs (17 vs 13); Mont Orignal skews more expert (50% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mont-Grand-Fonds | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mont Orignal | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Related comparisons
Mont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Tremblant ResortMont Orignal vs Mont Tremblant ResortLe Massif vs Mont-Grand-FondsLe Massif vs Mont OrignalMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont-Sainte-AnneMont Orignal vs Mont-Sainte-AnneMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont SuttonMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mount Sutton
More detail: Mont-Grand-Fonds stats · Mont Orignal stats