Mont-Grand-Fonds vs Stoneham Mountain Resort
Mont-Grand-Fonds (Quebec) and Stoneham Mountain Resort (Quebec) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mont-Grand-Fonds | Stoneham Mountain Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,086 ft (331 m) | 1,129 ft (344 m) |
| Summit elevation | 2,382 ft | 1,949 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,296 ft | 820 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 6 |
| Runs | 13 | 55 |
| Beginner terrain | 31% | 22% |
| Intermediate terrain | 38% | 33% |
| Expert terrain | 31% | 45% |
| Night skiing | - | Yes |
Stoneham Mountain Resort has the bigger vertical (1,129 ft vs 1,086 ft); Stoneham Mountain Resort has more runs (55 vs 13); Stoneham Mountain Resort skews more expert (45% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mont-Grand-Fonds | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Stoneham Mountain Resort | Epic Pass: 7 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mont-Grand-Fonds
Related comparisons
Mont Tremblant Resort vs Stoneham Mountain ResortMont-Grand-Fonds vs Mont Tremblant ResortLe Massif vs Stoneham Mountain ResortMont-Sainte-Anne vs Stoneham Mountain ResortMont Sutton vs Stoneham Mountain ResortMount Sutton vs Stoneham Mountain ResortSki Bromont vs Stoneham Mountain ResortLe Massif vs Mont-Grand-Fonds
More detail: Mont-Grand-Fonds stats · Stoneham Mountain Resort stats