Mount Waterman vs Palisades Tahoe
Mount Waterman (California) and Palisades Tahoe (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Waterman | Palisades Tahoe |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,001 ft (305 m) | 2,539 ft (774 m) |
| Summit elevation | 7,956 ft | 8,740 ft |
| Base elevation | 6,959 ft | 6,201 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 31 |
| Runs | 20 | 109 |
| Beginner terrain | 35% | 14% |
| Intermediate terrain | 30% | 42% |
| Expert terrain | 35% | 44% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Palisades Tahoe has the bigger vertical (2,539 ft vs 1,001 ft); Palisades Tahoe has more runs (109 vs 20); Palisades Tahoe skews more expert (44% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Waterman | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Palisades Tahoe | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Waterman
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Waterman
Related comparisons
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Palisades TahoeNorthstar California vs Palisades TahoeAlpine Meadows vs Palisades TahoeChina Peak vs Palisades TahoePalisades Tahoe vs Sierra-at-TahoeBear Valley Mountain Resort vs Palisades TahoePalisades Tahoe vs Sugar Bowl Ski ResortJune Mountain Ski Area vs Palisades Tahoe
More detail: Mount Waterman stats · Palisades Tahoe stats