Stowe Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush Resort
Stowe Mountain Resort (Vermont) and Sugarbush Resort (Vermont) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Stowe Mountain Resort | Sugarbush Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 2,336 ft (712 m) | 2,552 ft (778 m) |
| Summit elevation | 3,648 ft | 4,062 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,312 ft | 1,512 ft |
| Lifts | 12 | 18 |
| Runs | 144 | 142 |
| Beginner terrain | 18% | 20% |
| Intermediate terrain | 61% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 21% | 39% |
| Night skiing | No | No |
Sugarbush Resort has the bigger vertical (2,552 ft vs 2,336 ft); Stowe Mountain Resort has more runs (144 vs 142); Sugarbush Resort skews more expert (39% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Stowe Mountain Resort | Epic Pass: unlimited days |
| Sugarbush Resort | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Stowe Mountain Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Stowe Mountain Resort
Related comparisons
Killington Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortKillington Ski Resort vs Stowe Mountain ResortSugarbush Resort vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafOkemo Mountain vs Sugarbush ResortMount Snow Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortOkemo Mountain vs Stowe Mountain ResortStratton Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush Resort
More detail: Stowe Mountain Resort stats · Sugarbush Resort stats