Ascutney Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush Resort
Ascutney Mountain Resort (Vermont) and Sugarbush Resort (Vermont) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Ascutney Mountain Resort | Sugarbush Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 443 ft (135 m) | 2,552 ft (778 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,220 ft | 4,062 ft |
| Base elevation | 774 ft | 1,512 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 18 |
| Runs | 26 | 142 |
| Beginner terrain | 40% | 20% |
| Intermediate terrain | 52% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 8% | 39% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Sugarbush Resort has the bigger vertical (2,552 ft vs 443 ft); Sugarbush Resort has more runs (142 vs 26); Sugarbush Resort skews more expert (39% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Ascutney Mountain Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sugarbush Resort | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Ascutney Mountain Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Ascutney Mountain Resort
Related comparisons
Killington Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortSugarbush Resort vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafOkemo Mountain vs Sugarbush ResortStowe Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush ResortMount Snow Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortStratton Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush ResortSmugglers' Notch vs Sugarbush Resort
More detail: Ascutney Mountain Resort stats · Sugarbush Resort stats