Coppervale Ski Area vs Mount Waterman
Coppervale Ski Area (California) and Mount Waterman (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Coppervale Ski Area | Mount Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 554 ft (169 m) | 1,001 ft (305 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,820 ft | 7,956 ft |
| Base elevation | 5,262 ft | 6,959 ft |
| Lifts | 2 | 3 |
| Runs | 5 | 20 |
| Beginner terrain | 40% | 35% |
| Intermediate terrain | 40% | 30% |
| Expert terrain | 20% | 35% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mount Waterman has the bigger vertical (1,001 ft vs 554 ft); Mount Waterman has more runs (20 vs 5); Mount Waterman skews more expert (35% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Coppervale Ski Area | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Waterman | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Coppervale Ski Area
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Coppervale Ski Area
Related comparisons
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Mount WatermanCoppervale Ski Area vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaMount Waterman vs Palisades TahoeCoppervale Ski Area vs Palisades TahoeMount Waterman vs Northstar CaliforniaCoppervale Ski Area vs Northstar CaliforniaAlpine Meadows vs Mount WatermanChina Peak vs Mount Waterman
More detail: Coppervale Ski Area stats · Mount Waterman stats