Kirkwood Mountain Resort vs Mount Waterman
Kirkwood Mountain Resort (California) and Mount Waterman (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Kirkwood Mountain Resort | Mount Waterman |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,657 ft (505 m) | 1,001 ft (305 m) |
| Summit elevation | 9,469 ft | 7,956 ft |
| Base elevation | 7,815 ft | 6,959 ft |
| Lifts | 13 | 3 |
| Runs | 50 | 20 |
| Beginner terrain | 12% | 35% |
| Intermediate terrain | 32% | 30% |
| Expert terrain | 56% | 35% |
| Night skiing | No | - |
Kirkwood Mountain Resort has the bigger vertical (1,657 ft vs 1,001 ft); Kirkwood Mountain Resort has more runs (50 vs 20); Kirkwood Mountain Resort skews more expert (56% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Kirkwood Mountain Resort | Epic Pass: unlimited days |
| Mount Waterman | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Kirkwood Mountain Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Kirkwood Mountain Resort
Related comparisons
Kirkwood Mountain Resort vs Mammoth Mountain Ski AreaHeavenly Mountain Resort vs Kirkwood Mountain ResortKirkwood Mountain Resort vs Palisades TahoeMammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Mount WatermanKirkwood Mountain Resort vs Northstar CaliforniaMount Waterman vs Palisades TahoeAlpine Meadows vs Kirkwood Mountain ResortChina Peak vs Kirkwood Mountain Resort
More detail: Kirkwood Mountain Resort stats · Mount Waterman stats