Loon Mountain Ski Resort vs Sugarbush Resort
Loon Mountain Ski Resort (New Hampshire) and Sugarbush Resort (Vermont) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Loon Mountain Ski Resort | Sugarbush Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 2,185 ft (666 m) | 2,552 ft (778 m) |
| Summit elevation | 3,048 ft | 4,062 ft |
| Base elevation | 860 ft | 1,512 ft |
| Lifts | 12 | 18 |
| Runs | 80 | 142 |
| Beginner terrain | 26% | 20% |
| Intermediate terrain | 51% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 23% | 39% |
| Night skiing | No | No |
Sugarbush Resort has the bigger vertical (2,552 ft vs 2,185 ft); Sugarbush Resort has more runs (142 vs 80); Sugarbush Resort skews more expert (39% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Loon Mountain Ski Resort | Ikon Pass: 7 days |
| Sugarbush Resort | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
One pass covers both: Ikon Pass. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Loon Mountain Ski Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Loon Mountain Ski Resort
Related comparisons
Killington Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortSugarbush Resort vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafOkemo Mountain vs Sugarbush ResortKillington Ski Resort vs Loon Mountain Ski ResortStowe Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush ResortMount Snow Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortStratton Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush Resort
More detail: Loon Mountain Ski Resort stats · Sugarbush Resort stats