Mount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis Moonstone
Mount Pakenham (Ontario) and Mount St. Louis Moonstone (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Pakenham | Mount St. Louis Moonstone |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 262 ft (80 m) | 509 ft (155 m) |
| Summit elevation | 702 ft | 1,214 ft |
| Base elevation | 440 ft | 705 ft |
| Lifts | 6 | 10 |
| Runs | 15 | 41 |
| Beginner terrain | 53% | 32% |
| Intermediate terrain | 27% | 34% |
| Expert terrain | 20% | 34% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Mount St. Louis Moonstone has the bigger vertical (509 ft vs 262 ft); Mount St. Louis Moonstone has more runs (41 vs 15); Mount St. Louis Moonstone skews more expert (34% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount St. Louis Moonstone | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Pakenham
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Pakenham
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamCraigleith Ski Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneMount St. Louis Moonstone vs Snow ValleyGeorgian Peaks Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneHorseshoe Resort vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCaledon Ski Club vs Mount St. Louis Moonstone
More detail: Mount Pakenham stats · Mount St. Louis Moonstone stats