Mount Waterman vs Sierra-at-Tahoe
Mount Waterman (California) and Sierra-at-Tahoe (California) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Waterman | Sierra-at-Tahoe |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,001 ft (305 m) | 2,175 ft (663 m) |
| Summit elevation | 7,956 ft | 8,835 ft |
| Base elevation | 6,959 ft | 6,660 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 13 |
| Runs | 20 | 41 |
| Beginner terrain | 35% | 41% |
| Intermediate terrain | 30% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 35% | 18% |
| Night skiing | - | No |
Sierra-at-Tahoe has the bigger vertical (2,175 ft vs 1,001 ft); Sierra-at-Tahoe has more runs (41 vs 20); Mount Waterman skews more expert (35% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Waterman | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Sierra-at-Tahoe | Ikon Pass: 7 days |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Waterman
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Waterman
Related comparisons
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Sierra-at-TahoePalisades Tahoe vs Sierra-at-TahoeNorthstar California vs Sierra-at-TahoeMammoth Mountain Ski Area vs Mount WatermanMount Waterman vs Palisades TahoeAlpine Meadows vs Sierra-at-TahoeChina Peak vs Sierra-at-TahoeBear Valley Mountain Resort vs Sierra-at-Tahoe
More detail: Mount Waterman stats · Sierra-at-Tahoe stats