Pico Mountain vs Sugarbush Resort
Pico Mountain (Vermont) and Sugarbush Resort (Vermont) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Pico Mountain | Sugarbush Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 1,932 ft (589 m) | 2,552 ft (778 m) |
| Summit elevation | 3,934 ft | 4,062 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,001 ft | 1,512 ft |
| Lifts | 7 | 18 |
| Runs | 68 | 142 |
| Beginner terrain | 20% | 20% |
| Intermediate terrain | 53% | 41% |
| Expert terrain | 27% | 39% |
| Night skiing | No | No |
Sugarbush Resort has the bigger vertical (2,552 ft vs 1,932 ft); Sugarbush Resort has more runs (142 vs 68); Sugarbush Resort skews more expert (39% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Pico Mountain | Ikon Pass: 7 days |
| Sugarbush Resort | Ikon Pass: unlimited days |
One pass covers both: Ikon Pass. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Pico Mountain
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Pico Mountain
Related comparisons
Killington Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortSugarbush Resort vs Sunday RiverSugarbush Resort vs SugarloafOkemo Mountain vs Sugarbush ResortStowe Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush ResortMount Snow Ski Resort vs Sugarbush ResortStratton Mountain Resort vs Sugarbush ResortKillington Ski Resort vs Pico Mountain
More detail: Pico Mountain stats · Sugarbush Resort stats