Calabogie Peaks vs Mount Pakenham
Calabogie Peaks (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Calabogie Peaks | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 702 ft (214 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,220 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 518 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 6 |
| Runs | 28 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 37% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 41% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 22% | 20% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Calabogie Peaks has the bigger vertical (702 ft vs 262 ft); Calabogie Peaks has more runs (28 vs 15); Calabogie Peaks skews more expert (22% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Calabogie Peaks | Indy Pass: 2 days |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Calabogie Peaks
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Calabogie Peaks
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Calabogie PeaksBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamCalabogie Peaks vs Titus MountainCalabogie Peaks vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCalabogie Peaks vs Craigleith Ski ClubMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCalabogie Peaks vs Snow ValleyCalabogie Peaks vs Camp Fortune
More detail: Calabogie Peaks stats · Mount Pakenham stats