Caledon Ski Club vs Mount Pakenham
Caledon Ski Club (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Caledon Ski Club | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 246 ft (75 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,342 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,096 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 8 | 6 |
| Runs | 26 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 27% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 38% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 35% | 20% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mount Pakenham has the bigger vertical (262 ft vs 246 ft); Caledon Ski Club has more runs (26 vs 15); Caledon Ski Club skews more expert (35% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Caledon Ski Club | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Caledon Ski Club
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Caledon Ski Club
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Caledon Ski ClubBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamCaledon Ski Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCaledon Ski Club vs Craigleith Ski ClubMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCaledon Ski Club vs Snow ValleyCaledon Ski Club vs Georgian Peaks ClubBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Caledon Ski Club
More detail: Caledon Ski Club stats · Mount Pakenham stats