Chicopee Ski Club vs Mount Pakenham
Chicopee Ski Club (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Chicopee Ski Club | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 180 ft (55 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,220 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 1,040 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 8 | 6 |
| Runs | 14 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 21% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 50% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 29% | 20% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mount Pakenham has the bigger vertical (262 ft vs 180 ft); Mount Pakenham has more runs (15 vs 14); Chicopee Ski Club skews more expert (29% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Chicopee Ski Club | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Chicopee Ski Club
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Chicopee Ski Club
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Chicopee Ski ClubBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamChicopee Ski Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneChicopee Ski Club vs Craigleith Ski ClubChicopee Ski Club vs Snow ValleyCraigleith Ski Club vs Mount PakenhamMount Pakenham vs Snow Valley
More detail: Chicopee Ski Club stats · Mount Pakenham stats