Falls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort
Falls Creek Alpine Resort (Victoria) and Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort (Victoria) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Falls Creek Alpine Resort | Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 876 ft (267 m) | 367 ft (112 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,820 ft | 5,138 ft |
| Base elevation | 4,944 ft | 4,774 ft |
| Lifts | 14 | 8 |
| Runs | 77 | 23 |
| Beginner terrain | 14% | 22% |
| Intermediate terrain | 48% | 61% |
| Expert terrain | 38% | 17% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Falls Creek Alpine Resort has the bigger vertical (876 ft vs 367 ft); Falls Creek Alpine Resort has more runs (77 vs 23); Falls Creek Alpine Resort skews more expert (38% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Falls Creek Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Falls Creek Alpine Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Falls Creek Alpine Resort
Related comparisons
Falls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mount Buller Alpine ResortFalls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine ResortMount Baw Baw Alpine Resort vs Mount Buller Alpine ResortMount Baw Baw Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine Resort
More detail: Falls Creek Alpine Resort stats · Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort stats