Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine Resort
Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort (Victoria) and Mt Hotham Alpine Resort (Victoria) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort | Mt Hotham Alpine Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 367 ft (112 m) | 1,335 ft (407 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,138 ft | 6,089 ft |
| Base elevation | 4,774 ft | 4,754 ft |
| Lifts | 8 | 14 |
| Runs | 23 | 106 |
| Beginner terrain | 22% | 6% |
| Intermediate terrain | 61% | 56% |
| Expert terrain | 17% | 38% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mt Hotham Alpine Resort has the bigger vertical (1,335 ft vs 367 ft); Mt Hotham Alpine Resort has more runs (106 vs 23); Mt Hotham Alpine Resort skews more expert (38% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mt Hotham Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort
Related comparisons
Mount Buller Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine ResortFalls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine ResortMount Baw Baw Alpine Resort vs Mount Buller Alpine ResortFalls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort
More detail: Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort stats · Mt Hotham Alpine Resort stats