Falls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine Resort
Falls Creek Alpine Resort (Victoria) and Mt Hotham Alpine Resort (Victoria) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Falls Creek Alpine Resort | Mt Hotham Alpine Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 876 ft (267 m) | 1,335 ft (407 m) |
| Summit elevation | 5,820 ft | 6,089 ft |
| Base elevation | 4,944 ft | 4,754 ft |
| Lifts | 14 | 14 |
| Runs | 77 | 106 |
| Beginner terrain | 14% | 6% |
| Intermediate terrain | 48% | 56% |
| Expert terrain | 38% | 38% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mt Hotham Alpine Resort has the bigger vertical (1,335 ft vs 876 ft); Mt Hotham Alpine Resort has more runs (106 vs 77).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Falls Creek Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mt Hotham Alpine Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Falls Creek Alpine Resort
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Falls Creek Alpine Resort
Related comparisons
Mount Buller Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine ResortFalls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mount Buller Alpine ResortMount Baw Baw Alpine Resort vs Mt Hotham Alpine ResortFalls Creek Alpine Resort vs Mount Baw Baw Alpine Resort
More detail: Falls Creek Alpine Resort stats · Mt Hotham Alpine Resort stats