Georgian Peaks Club vs Mount Pakenham
Georgian Peaks Club (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Georgian Peaks Club | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 817 ft (249 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,421 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 607 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 5 | 6 |
| Runs | 21 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 10% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 67% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 23% | 20% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Georgian Peaks Club has the bigger vertical (817 ft vs 262 ft); Georgian Peaks Club has more runs (21 vs 15); Georgian Peaks Club skews more expert (23% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Georgian Peaks Club | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Georgian Peaks Club
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Georgian Peaks Club
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Georgian Peaks ClubBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamGeorgian Peaks Club vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCraigleith Ski Club vs Georgian Peaks ClubGeorgian Peaks Club vs Snow ValleyMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Georgian Peaks ClubGeorgian Peaks Club vs Horseshoe Resort
More detail: Georgian Peaks Club stats · Mount Pakenham stats