Golm vs Laterns-Gapfohl
Golm (Vorarlberg) and Laterns-Gapfohl (Vorarlberg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Golm | Laterns-Gapfohl |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 4,767 ft (1,453 m) | 2,067 ft (630 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,900 ft | 5,807 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,133 ft | 3,743 ft |
| Lifts | 9 | 12 |
| Runs | 49 | 37 |
| Beginner terrain | 63% | 41% |
| Intermediate terrain | 22% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 15% | 32% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Golm has the bigger vertical (4,767 ft vs 2,067 ft); Golm has more runs (49 vs 37); Laterns-Gapfohl skews more expert (32% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Golm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Laterns-Gapfohl | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Golm
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Golm
Related comparisons
Golm vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Laterns-Gapfohl vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Golm vs Warth and SchröckenGolm vs Sonnenkopf (skiing area)Damüls-Mellau vs GolmGolm vs ParpfienzalpeBödele vs GolmLaterns-Gapfohl vs Warth and Schröcken
More detail: Golm stats · Laterns-Gapfohl stats