Golm vs Parpfienzalpe
Golm (Vorarlberg) and Parpfienzalpe (Vorarlberg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Golm | Parpfienzalpe |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 4,767 ft (1,453 m) | 3,553 ft (1,083 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,900 ft | 6,467 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,133 ft | 2,917 ft |
| Lifts | 9 | 12 |
| Runs | 49 | 70 |
| Beginner terrain | 63% | 70% |
| Intermediate terrain | 22% | 30% |
| Expert terrain | 15% | 0% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Golm has the bigger vertical (4,767 ft vs 3,553 ft); Parpfienzalpe has more runs (70 vs 49); Golm skews more expert (15% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Golm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Parpfienzalpe | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Golm
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Golm
Related comparisons
Golm vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Parpfienzalpe vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Golm vs Warth and SchröckenGolm vs Sonnenkopf (skiing area)Damüls-Mellau vs GolmParpfienzalpe vs Warth and SchröckenParpfienzalpe vs Sonnenkopf (skiing area)Damüls-Mellau vs Parpfienzalpe
More detail: Golm stats · Parpfienzalpe stats