Golm vs Warth and Schröcken
Golm (Vorarlberg) and Warth and Schröcken (Vorarlberg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Golm | Warth and Schröcken |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 4,767 ft (1,453 m) | 2,320 ft (707 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,900 ft | 7,077 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,133 ft | 4,757 ft |
| Lifts | 9 | 21 |
| Runs | 49 | 119 |
| Beginner terrain | 63% | 62% |
| Intermediate terrain | 22% | 22% |
| Expert terrain | 15% | 16% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Golm has the bigger vertical (4,767 ft vs 2,320 ft); Warth and Schröcken has more runs (119 vs 49); Warth and Schröcken skews more expert (16% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Golm | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Warth and Schröcken | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Golm
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Golm
Related comparisons
Golm vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Silvretta Montafon (Ski area) vs Warth and SchröckenGolm vs Sonnenkopf (skiing area)Sonnenkopf (skiing area) vs Warth and SchröckenDamüls-Mellau vs GolmDamüls-Mellau vs Warth and SchröckenGolm vs ParpfienzalpeParpfienzalpe vs Warth and Schröcken
More detail: Golm stats · Warth and Schröcken stats