Parpfienzalpe vs Warth and Schröcken
Parpfienzalpe (Vorarlberg) and Warth and Schröcken (Vorarlberg) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Parpfienzalpe | Warth and Schröcken |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 3,553 ft (1,083 m) | 2,320 ft (707 m) |
| Summit elevation | 6,467 ft | 7,077 ft |
| Base elevation | 2,917 ft | 4,757 ft |
| Lifts | 12 | 21 |
| Runs | 70 | 119 |
| Beginner terrain | 70% | 62% |
| Intermediate terrain | 30% | 22% |
| Expert terrain | 0% | 16% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Parpfienzalpe has the bigger vertical (3,553 ft vs 2,320 ft); Warth and Schröcken has more runs (119 vs 70); Warth and Schröcken skews more expert (16% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Parpfienzalpe | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Warth and Schröcken | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Parpfienzalpe
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Parpfienzalpe
Related comparisons
Silvretta Montafon (Ski area) vs Warth and SchröckenParpfienzalpe vs Silvretta Montafon (Ski area)Golm vs Warth and SchröckenSonnenkopf (skiing area) vs Warth and SchröckenDamüls-Mellau vs Warth and SchröckenGolm vs ParpfienzalpeParpfienzalpe vs Sonnenkopf (skiing area)Damüls-Mellau vs Parpfienzalpe
More detail: Parpfienzalpe stats · Warth and Schröcken stats