Mount Pakenham vs Searchmont Resort
Mount Pakenham (Ontario) and Searchmont Resort (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Pakenham | Searchmont Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 262 ft (80 m) | 623 ft (190 m) |
| Summit elevation | 702 ft | 1,394 ft |
| Base elevation | 440 ft | 771 ft |
| Lifts | 6 | 5 |
| Runs | 15 | 20 |
| Beginner terrain | 53% | 33% |
| Intermediate terrain | 27% | 28% |
| Expert terrain | 20% | 39% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Searchmont Resort has the bigger vertical (623 ft vs 262 ft); Searchmont Resort has more runs (20 vs 15); Searchmont Resort skews more expert (39% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Searchmont Resort | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Pakenham
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Pakenham
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Searchmont ResortBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamMount St. Louis Moonstone vs Searchmont ResortCraigleith Ski Club vs Searchmont ResortMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneSearchmont Resort vs Snow ValleyGeorgian Peaks Club vs Searchmont ResortBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Searchmont Resort
More detail: Mount Pakenham stats · Searchmont Resort stats