Loch Lomond vs Mount Pakenham
Loch Lomond (Ontario) and Mount Pakenham (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Loch Lomond | Mount Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 587 ft (179 m) | 262 ft (80 m) |
| Summit elevation | 1,414 ft | 702 ft |
| Base elevation | 823 ft | 440 ft |
| Lifts | 3 | 6 |
| Runs | 22 | 15 |
| Beginner terrain | 27% | 53% |
| Intermediate terrain | 32% | 27% |
| Expert terrain | 41% | 20% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Loch Lomond has the bigger vertical (587 ft vs 262 ft); Loch Lomond has more runs (22 vs 15); Loch Lomond skews more expert (41% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Loch Lomond | Indy Pass: 2 days |
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Loch Lomond
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Loch Lomond
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Loch LomondBlue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamLoch Lomond vs Lutsen MountainsLoch Lomond vs Snowriver MountainLoch Lomond vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCraigleith Ski Club vs Loch LomondLoch Lomond vs Snow Valley
More detail: Loch Lomond stats · Mount Pakenham stats