Mount Pakenham vs Uplands Golf & Ski Club
Mount Pakenham (Ontario) and Uplands Golf & Ski Club (Ontario) head-to-head: stats, terrain, and 2026-27 pass coverage.
| Stat | Mount Pakenham | Uplands Golf & Ski Club |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical drop | 262 ft (80 m) | 95 ft (29 m) |
| Summit elevation | 702 ft | 640 ft |
| Base elevation | 440 ft | 545 ft |
| Lifts | 6 | 2 |
| Runs | 15 | 4 |
| Beginner terrain | 53% | 25% |
| Intermediate terrain | 27% | 50% |
| Expert terrain | 20% | 25% |
| Night skiing | - | - |
Mount Pakenham has the bigger vertical (262 ft vs 95 ft); Mount Pakenham has more runs (15 vs 4); Uplands Golf & Ski Club skews more expert (25% expert terrain).
Which pass covers them?
| Resort | Pass coverage (2026-27) |
|---|---|
| Mount Pakenham | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
| Uplands Golf & Ski Club | Not on a major pass; lift tickets only |
No single pass covers both, so skiing both means separate passes or lift tickets. Check your full resort list in the pass finder →
Stay near Mount Pakenham
Lodging near the base fills up first during peak weeks. Search stays near Mount Pakenham
Related comparisons
Blue Mountain vs Mount PakenhamBlue Mountain vs Uplands Golf & Ski ClubMount Pakenham vs Mount St. Louis MoonstoneCraigleith Ski Club vs Mount PakenhamMount Pakenham vs Snow ValleyGeorgian Peaks Club vs Mount PakenhamBeaver Valley Ski Club vs Mount PakenhamHorseshoe Resort vs Mount Pakenham
More detail: Mount Pakenham stats · Uplands Golf & Ski Club stats